Header Logo

Connection

Rosemary Zuna to Colposcopy

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Rosemary Zuna has written about Colposcopy.
Connection Strength

1.235
  1. Cervical smear interpretations in women with a histologic diagnosis of severe dysplasia: factors associated with discrepant interpretations. Cancer. 2002 Aug 25; 96(4):218-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  2. A prospective study of risk-based colposcopy demonstrates improved detection of cervical precancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 06; 218(6):604.e1-604.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  3. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 12; 130(6):1218-1225.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  4. Comparison of Colposcopic Impression Based on Live Colposcopy and Evaluation of Static Digital Images. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Apr; 20(2):154-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  5. Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 01; 33(1):83-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  6. Grading the severity of cervical neoplasia based on combined histopathology, cytopathology, and HPV genotype distribution among 1,700 women referred to colposcopy in Oklahoma. Int J Cancer. 2009 Feb 15; 124(4):964-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  7. Towards improved biomarker studies of cervical neoplasia: effects of precolposcopic procedures on gene expression patterns. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2005 Jun; 14(2):59-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  8. Accuracy and Efficiency of Deep-Learning-Based Automation of Dual Stain Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 01 04; 113(1):72-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  9. A Systematic Review of Tests for Postcolposcopy and Posttreatment Surveillance. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr; 24(2):148-156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  10. Reporting and Assessing the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr; 24(2):157-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  11. Proof-of-principle study of a novel cervical screening and triage strategy: Computer-analyzed cytology to decide which HPV-positive women are likely to have =CIN2. Int J Cancer. 2017 Feb 01; 140(3):718-725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  12. Evaluation of clinical performance of a novel urine-based HPV detection assay among women attending a colposcopy clinic. J Clin Virol. 2014 Aug; 60(4):414-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  13. Tubal ligation frequency in Oklahoma women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov; 127(2):278-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  14. Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 01; 18(15):4154-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  15. Heterogeneity of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia related to HPV16: implications for natural history and management. Int J Cancer. 2013 Jan 01; 132(1):148-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  16. Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e29051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  17. Accuracy of cervical specimens obtained for biomarker studies in women with CIN3. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec; 115(3):493-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  18. Human papillomavirus cofactors by disease progression and human papillomavirus types in the study to understand cervical cancer early endpoints and determinants. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jan; 18(1):113-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  19. A LEEP cervical conization is rarely indicated for a two-step discrepancy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Jul; 11(3):134-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.