Header Logo

Connection

Sarah Little to Pregnancy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Sarah Little has written about Pregnancy.
Sarah Little
Connection Strength
3.595
Pregnancy
  1. Rates of Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks and Cesarean Delivery Following Publication of the ARRIVE Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 08 01; 6(8):e2328274.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  2. Investigating Decreased Rates of Nulliparous Cesarean Deliveries during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Perinatol. 2021 10; 38(12):1231-1235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  3. Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 06; 224(6):611.e1-611.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  4. Falling insulin requirement in late pregnancy: association with obstetric and neonatal outcomes. J Perinatol. 2021 05; 41(5):1043-1049.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  5. Preterm Birth During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in a Large Hospital System in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 03 01; 137(3):403-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  6. Changes in Delivery Timing for High-Risk Pregnancies in the United States. Am J Perinatol. 2021 11; 38(13):1373-1379.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  7. Using Cervical Dilation to Predict Labor Onset: A Tool for Elective Labor Induction Counseling. Am J Perinatol. 2019 12; 36(14):1485-1491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  8. Risk factors for poor perineal outcome after operative vaginal delivery. J Perinatol. 2018 12; 38(12):1625-1630.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  9. Outcomes of Spontaneous Labor in Women Undergoing Trial of Labor after Cesarean as Compared with Nulliparous Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Am J Perinatol. 2018 07; 35(9):852-857.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  10. Elective Induction of Labor: What is the Impact? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec; 44(4):601-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  11. The U.S. Twin Delivery Volume and Association with Cesarean Delivery Rates: A Hospital-Level Analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2018 Mar; 35(4):345-353.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  12. The influence of noninvasive prenatal testing on gestational age at time of abortion for aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn. 2017 Jul; 37(7):635-639.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  13. The relationship between the rising cesarean delivery and postpartum readmission rates. J Perinatol. 2017 04; 37(4):355-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  14. In Reply. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr; 127(4):804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  15. The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun; 214(6):735.e1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  16. A Multi-State Analysis of Early-Term Delivery Trends and the Association With Term Stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec; 126(6):1138-1145.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  17. Second trimester dilation and evacuation: a risk factor for preterm birth? J Perinatol. 2015 Dec; 35(12):1006-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  18. Induction of Labor and Cesarean: What is the True Relationship? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun; 58(2):269-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  19. Obstetrician volume as a potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct; 124(4):697-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  20. Use of the combined tetanus-diphtheria and pertussis vaccine during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep; 211(3):299.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  21. The effect of obstetric practice change to reduce early term delivery on perinatal outcome. J Perinatol. 2014 Mar; 34(3):176-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  22. Estimated fetal weight by ultrasound: a modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct; 207(4):309.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  23. The cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening for spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar; 202(3):253.e1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  24. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):593-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  25. Acyclovir prophylaxis for pregnant women with a known history of herpes simplex virus: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1274-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  26. Development of a Practical Prediction Model for Adverse Neonatal Outcomes at the Start of the Second Stage of Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan 01; 145(1):73-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  27. Safety of Pregnancy and Delivery With Shunted Hydrocephalus. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 03; 7(9):e2434688.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  28. The patient experience of a postpartum readmission for hypertension: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 14; 24(1):358.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  29. Association between morbidity among term newborns and low-risk caesarean delivery rates. BJOG. 2022 Mar; 129(4):627-635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  30. Association between hospital-level cesarean delivery rates and severe maternal morbidity and unexpected newborn complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 11; 3(6):100474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  31. Hysterotomy Extension at Cesarean Delivery and Future Uterine Rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 02 01; 137(2):271-272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  32. Implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st gestational dating and fetal and newborn growth standards in Nairobi, Kenya: women's experiences with ultrasound and newborn assessment. Glob Health Action. 2020 12 31; 13(1):1770967.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  33. Birthweight and Chemotherapy Exposure in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer during Pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2022 04; 39(5):554-561.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  34. Cephalic Elevation Device for Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 04; 135(4):879-884.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  35. Does Universal Coverage Mitigate Racial Disparities in Potentially Avoidable Maternal Complications? Am J Perinatol. 2021 07; 38(8):848-856.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  36. Response to Letter. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 01; 135(1):220-221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  37. Potential Effects of Regionalized Maternity Care on U.S. Hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 09; 134(3):545-552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  38. Implementing the INTERGROWTH-21st gestational dating and fetal and newborn growth standards in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya: Provider experiences, uptake and clinical decision-making. PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0213388.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  39. Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Vaginal Birth for Twins. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 07; 132(1):85-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  40. The relative effects of patient and hospital factors on postpartum readmissions. J Perinatol. 2018 07; 38(7):804-812.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  41. When ultrasound anomalies are present: An estimation of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities not detected by cell-free DNA aneuploidy screens. Prenat Diagn. 2018 03; 38(4):250-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  42. Obstetric History and Likelihood of Preterm Birth of Twins. Am J Perinatol. 2018 09; 35(11):1023-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  43. Angle of Progression on Ultrasound in the Second Stage of Labor and Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2018 Mar; 35(4):413-420.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  44. Intrapartum obstetric care in the United States military: Comparison of military and civilian care systems within TRICARE. Birth. 2017 12; 44(4):337-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  45. Antepartum management and obstetric outcomes among pregnancies with Down syndrome from diagnosis to delivery. Prenat Diagn. 2017 Jul; 37(7):640-646.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  46. Patient selection for later delivery timing with suspected previa-accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Aug; 96(8):1021-1028.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  47. Pathologically Diagnosed Placenta Accreta and Hemorrhagic Morbidity in a Subsequent Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 02; 129(2):321-326.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  48. Disparities in receipt of a laparoscopic operation for ectopic pregnancy among TRICARE beneficiaries. Surgery. 2017 05; 161(5):1341-1347.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  49. A multi-state analysis of postpartum readmissions in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul; 215(1):113.e1-113.e10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  50. Patient choice and clinical outcomes following positive noninvasive prenatal screening for aneuploidy with cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Prenat Diagn. 2016 May; 36(5):456-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  51. Percutaneous umbilical blood sampling: current trends and outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May; 200:98-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  52. What is the role of the 11- to 14-week ultrasound in women with negative cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidy? Prenat Diagn. 2016 Mar; 36(3):260-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  53. Cesarean Delivery in Adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Oct; 29(5):443-447.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  54. Relationship between parity and brachial plexus injuries. J Perinatol. 2016 05; 36(5):357-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  55. CLINICAL DECISIONS. Is Home Birth Safe? N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 31; 373(27):2683-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  56. How Accurate Is the Dating of Scheduled 39-Week Deliveries? Am J Perinatol. 2016 Mar; 33(4):364-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  57. Angiogenic markers in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug; 213(2):212.e1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  58. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and timing of delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28(18):2254-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  59. Eliminating first trimester markers: will replacing PAPP-A and ßhCG miss women at risk for small for gestational age? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov; 27(17):1761-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  60. Prophylactic ampicillin versus cefazolin for the prevention of post-cesarean infectious morbidity in Rwanda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Mar; 124(3):244-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  61. Preterm preeclampsia: 32 to 37 weeks gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Nov; 25(11):2198-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  62. Herpes simplex virus and pregnancy: a review of the management of antenatal and peripartum herpes infections. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2011 Oct; 66(10):629-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  63. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Nov; 24(11):1341-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  64. Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb; 204(2):137.e1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  65. When should women with placenta previa be delivered? A decision analysis. J Reprod Med. 2010 Sep-Oct; 55(9-10):373-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  66. Early-onset preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 May; 23(5):389-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  67. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar; (176):1-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.