Header Logo

Connection

Ingo Schlupp to Mating Preference, Animal

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ingo Schlupp has written about Mating Preference, Animal.
Connection Strength

2.497
  1. Males can't afford to be choosy: Male reproductive investment does not influence preference for female size in Limia (Poeciliidae). Behav Processes. 2021 Feb; 183:104315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.737
  2. The role of mate-choice copying in speciation and hybridization. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 05; 93(2):1304-1322.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.602
  3. Male fish deceive competitors about mating preferences. Curr Biol. 2008 Aug 05; 18(15):1138-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  4. Male mate choice and sperm allocation in a sexual/asexual mating complex of Poecilia (Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Biol Lett. 2005 Jun 22; 1(2):169-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  5. Mate-choice copying accelerates species range expansion. Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Aug; 291(2029):20241201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  6. Rapid and socially induced change of a badge of status. J Fish Biol. 2012 Mar; 80(3):722-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  7. Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choice. Biol Lett. 2011 Jun 23; 7(3):349-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  8. Complementary effect of natural and sexual selection against immigrants maintains differentiation between locally adapted fish. Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Aug; 97(8):769-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  9. Does divergence in female mate choice affect male size distributions in two cave fish populations? Biol Lett. 2008 Oct 23; 4(5):452-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.