Edward Cokely to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Cokely has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.316
-
Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics. Hum Factors. 2017 06; 59(4):582-627.
Score: 0.032
-
Understanding the Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening: A Model of Factors That Shape Informed Decision Making. Med Decis Making. 2015 10; 35(7):847-58.
Score: 0.028
-
Brief Messages to Promote Prevention and Detection of Sexually Transmitted Infections. Curr HIV Res. 2015; 13(5):408-20.
Score: 0.028
-
Simple but powerful health messages for increasing condom use in young adults. J Sex Res. 2015; 52(1):30-42.
Score: 0.025
-
Advances in efficient health communication: promoting prevention and detection of STDs. Curr HIV Res. 2012 Apr; 10(3):262-70.
Score: 0.023
-
Effective communication of risks to young adults: using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Sep; 17(3):270-87.
Score: 0.022
-
Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar; 18(1):342-50.
Score: 0.018
-
The making of an expert. Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Jul-Aug; 85(7-8):114-21, 193.
Score: 0.016
-
Sources of individual differences in working memory: contributions of strategy to capacity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec; 13(6):991-7.
Score: 0.016
-
The free will and punishment scale: Efficient measurement and predictive validity across diverse and nationally representative adult samples. Conscious Cogn. 2021 10; 95:103215.
Score: 0.011
-
Parental Risk Literacy is Related to Quality of Life in Spanish Families of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Jul; 51(7):2475-2484.
Score: 0.011
-
Scientific risk reporting in medical journals can bias expert judgment: Comparing surgeons' risk comprehension across reporting formats. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Jun; 26(2):283-299.
Score: 0.010
-
Strengths and Gaps in Physicians' Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication. Med Decis Making. 2018 04; 38(3):355-365.
Score: 0.008
-
Numeracy Predicts Risk of Pre-Hospital Decision Delay: a Retrospective Study of Acute Coronary Syndrome Survival. Ann Behav Med. 2017 Apr; 51(2):292-306.
Score: 0.008
-
Measuring Graph Literacy without a Test: A Brief Subjective Assessment. Med Decis Making. 2016 10; 36(7):854-67.
Score: 0.008
-
Improving risk literacy in surgeons. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 07; 99(7):1156-1161.
Score: 0.007
-
Injury Risk Estimation Expertise: Cognitive-Perceptual Mechanisms of ACL-IQ. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2015 Jun; 37(3):291-304.
Score: 0.007
-
Improving risk understanding across ability levels: Encouraging active processing with dynamic icon arrays. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Jun; 21(2):178-94.
Score: 0.007
-
Injury Risk Estimation Expertise: Assessing the ACL Injury Risk Estimation Quiz. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul; 43(7):1640-7.
Score: 0.007
-
Improving Risk Communication About Sexually Transmitted Infections: Introduction to the Thematic Issue. Curr HIV Res. 2015; 13(5):334-6.
Score: 0.007
-
Factors predicting surgeons' preferred and actual roles in interactions with their patients. Health Psychol. 2014 Aug; 33(8):920-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: a test of the expertise defense. Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec; 20(4):1722-31.
Score: 0.005
-
Causal beliefs and empirical evidence. Exp Psychol. 2011; 58(4):324-32.
Score: 0.005