Header Logo

Connection

David Gordon to Clinical Competence

This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Gordon has written about Clinical Competence.
Connection Strength

0.770
  1. Stroke training of prehospital providers: an example of simulation-enhanced blended learning and evaluation. Med Teach. 2005 Mar; 27(2):114-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  2. Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance. Acad Med. 2019 06; 94(6):902-912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  3. Drawing Boundaries: The Difficulty in Defining Clinical Reasoning. Acad Med. 2018 07; 93(7):990-995.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  4. A multicenter study to provide evidence of construct validity in a computer-based outcome measure of neurology clinical skills. Acad Med. 2005 Oct; 80(10 Suppl):S71-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  5. Development of a reliable multimedia, computer-based measure of clinical skills in bedside neurology. Acad Med. 2003 Oct; 78(10 Suppl):S52-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  6. Development of a competency-based neurology clerkship. Med Educ. 2003 May; 37(5):484-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  7. Teamwork. University of Miami uses competition to sharpen EMS team performance. JEMS. 2001 Dec; 26(12):44-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  8. The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education: Implications and considerations. Med Teach. 2019 11; 41(11):1277-1284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  9. Effectiveness of a cardiology review course for internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. Teach Learn Med. 2002; 14(4):223-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  10. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA. 1999 Sep 01; 282(9):861-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.