Header Logo

Connection

Luca Fornelli to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Luca Fornelli has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.519
  1. Leveraging Ion-Ion and Ion-Photon Activation to Improve the Sequencing of Proteins Carrying Multiple Disulfide Bonds: The Human Serum Albumin Case Study. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2024 Dec 04; 35(12):3265-3273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  2. Enhanced Payload Localization in Antibody-Drug Conjugates Using a Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry Approach with Proton Transfer Charge Reduction. Anal Chem. 2024 Nov 19; 96(46):18483-18490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  3. Targeted Quantification of Proteoforms in Complex Samples by Proteoform Reaction Monitoring. Anal Chem. 2024 Feb 27; 96(8):3578-3586.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  4. Thorough Performance Evaluation of 213 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation for Top-down Proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2020 02; 19(2):405-420.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  5. Top-down analysis of immunoglobulin G isotypes 1 and 2 with electron transfer dissociation on a high-field Orbitrap mass spectrometer. J Proteomics. 2017 04 21; 159:67-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  6. Advancing Top-down Analysis of the Human Proteome Using a Benchtop Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer. J Proteome Res. 2017 02 03; 16(2):609-618.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  7. Top-down analysis of 30-80 kDa proteins by electron transfer dissociation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013 Oct; 405(26):8505-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  8. Analysis of intact monoclonal antibody IgG1 by electron transfer dissociation Orbitrap FTMS. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 Dec; 11(12):1758-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  9. Deamidation and transamidation of substance P by tissue transglutaminase revealed by electron-capture dissociation fourier transform mass spectrometry. Chemistry. 2011 Jan 10; 17(2):486-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  10. Comprehensive characterization of the Hsp70 interactome reveals novel client proteins and interactions mediated by posttranslational modifications. PLoS Biol. 2022 10; 20(10):e3001839.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  11. The Blood Proteoform Atlas: A reference map of proteoforms in human hematopoietic cells. Science. 2022 01 28; 375(6579):411-418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  12. Spectrum of Apolipoprotein AI and Apolipoprotein AII Proteoforms and Their Associations With Indices of Cardiometabolic Health: The CARDIA Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 09 07; 10(17):e019890.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  13. Oncogenic KRAS creates an aspartate metabolism signature in colorectal cancer cells. FEBS J. 2021 12; 288(23):6683-6699.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic platforms for better understanding of SARS-CoV-2 induced pathogenesis and potential diagnostic approaches. Proteomics. 2021 05; 21(10):e2000279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  15. Interlaboratory Study for Characterizing Monoclonal Antibodies by Top-Down and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2020 Sep 02; 31(9):1783-1802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  16. Defining the NSD2 interactome: PARP1 PARylation reduces NSD2 histone methyltransferase activity and impedes chromatin binding. J Biol Chem. 2019 08 16; 294(33):12459-12471.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  17. A comprehensive pipeline for translational top-down proteomics from a single blood draw. Nat Protoc. 2019 01; 14(1):119-152.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  18. A Targeted, Differential Top-Down Proteomic Methodology for Comparison of ApoA-I Proteoforms in Individuals with High and Low HDL Efflux Capacity. J Proteome Res. 2018 06 01; 17(6):2156-2164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  19. Precise characterization of KRAS4b proteoforms in human colorectal cells and tumors reveals mutation/modification cross-talk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 04 17; 115(16):4140-4145.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  20. Top-down characterization of endogenous protein complexes with native proteomics. Nat Chem Biol. 2018 Jan; 14(1):36-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  21. The Ups and Downs of Repeated Cleavage and Internal Fragment Production in Top-Down Proteomics. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2018 01; 29(1):150-157.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  22. Defining Gas-Phase Fragmentation Propensities of Intact Proteins During Native Top-Down Mass Spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2017 06; 28(6):1203-1215.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  23. Bioinformatics Analysis of Top-Down Mass Spectrometry Data with ProSight Lite. Methods Mol Biol. 2017; 1558:381-394.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  24. Progress in Top-Down Proteomics and the Analysis of Proteoforms. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2016 06 12; 9(1):499-519.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  25. Quantitation and Identification of Thousands of Human Proteoforms below 30 kDa. J Proteome Res. 2016 Mar 04; 15(3):976-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  26. Unabridged Analysis of Human Histone H3 by Differential Top-Down Mass Spectrometry Reveals Hypermethylated Proteoforms from MMSET/NSD2 Overexpression. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016 Mar; 15(3):776-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  27. Targeted analysis of recombinant NF kappa B (RelA/p65) by denaturing and native top down mass spectrometry. J Proteomics. 2016 Feb 16; 134:76-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  28. Advantages of extended bottom-up proteomics using Sap9 for analysis of monoclonal antibodies. Anal Chem. 2014 Oct 07; 86(19):9945-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  29. Glycan variability on a recombinant IgG antibody transiently produced in HEK-293E cells. N Biotechnol. 2012 May 15; 29(4):471-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  30. Structural analysis of intact monoclonal antibodies by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2011 Dec 01; 83(23):8919-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.