Michael Cookson to Robotics
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Cookson has written about Robotics.
Connection Strength
2.459
-
Editorial Comment. J Urol. 2020 05; 203(5):931-932.
Score: 0.648
-
Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010 Oct; 106(7):1036-40.
Score: 0.325
-
Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2008 May; 101(9):1140-4.
Score: 0.287
-
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90.
Score: 0.277
-
The evidence-based pathway for peri-operative management of open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007 May; 99(5):1103-8.
Score: 0.264
-
Positive influence of robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on the collaborative-care pathway for open radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006 Mar; 97(3):473-5.
Score: 0.247
-
Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Urology. 2014 Jun; 83(6):1309-15.
Score: 0.108
-
Salvage robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution, 5-year experience. J Urol. 2013 Feb; 189(2):507-13.
Score: 0.097
-
Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol. 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6.
Score: 0.081
-
Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31.
Score: 0.066
-
Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. J Urol. 2005 Sep; 174(3):912-4; discussion 914.
Score: 0.060