Header Logo

Connection

Michael Gold to Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gold has written about Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Michael Gold
Connection Strength
2.782
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
  1. Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ among women with a history of previous treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: ASCUS and LSIL Pap smears after treatment. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Jan; 15(1):11-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.344
  2. Adolescent cervical dysplasia: histologic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug; 197(2):141.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  3. Preoperative predictors of positive margins after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure-Cone. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Feb; 100(2):379-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.245
  4. Association of HPV35 with cervical carcinogenesis among women of African ancestry: Evidence of viral-host interaction with implications for disease intervention. Int J Cancer. 2020 11 15; 147(10):2677-2686.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  5. Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or Worse by Cytology, Human Papillomavirus 16/18, and Colposcopy Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 09; 132(3):725-735.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  6. A prospective study of risk-based colposcopy demonstrates improved detection of cervical precancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 06; 218(6):604.e1-604.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  7. Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 01; 33(1):83-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  8. Evaluation of clinical performance of a novel urine-based HPV detection assay among women attending a colposcopy clinic. J Clin Virol. 2014 Aug; 60(4):414-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  9. Chromosomal gains measured in cytology samples from women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep; 130(3):595-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  10. The role of co-factors in the progression from human papillomavirus infection to cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb; 128(2):265-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  11. Tubal ligation frequency in Oklahoma women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov; 127(2):278-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  12. Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 01; 18(15):4154-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  13. Heterogeneity of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia related to HPV16: implications for natural history and management. Int J Cancer. 2013 Jan 01; 132(1):148-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  14. Molecular mapping of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia shows etiological dominance of HPV16. Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 15; 131(6):E946-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  15. Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e29051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  16. Cervical dysplasia in pregnancy: a multi-institutional evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug; 203(2):113.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  17. Accuracy of cervical specimens obtained for biomarker studies in women with CIN3. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec; 115(3):493-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  18. Grading the severity of cervical neoplasia based on combined histopathology, cytopathology, and HPV genotype distribution among 1,700 women referred to colposcopy in Oklahoma. Int J Cancer. 2009 Feb 15; 124(4):964-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  19. Human papillomavirus cofactors by disease progression and human papillomavirus types in the study to understand cervical cancer early endpoints and determinants. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jan; 18(1):113-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  20. A LEEP cervical conization is rarely indicated for a two-step discrepancy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Jul; 11(3):134-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  21. Optical detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in vivo: results of a 604-patient study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May; 190(5):1249-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  22. ZYC101a for treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb; 103(2):317-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  23. Immunotherapy of human cervical high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with microparticle-delivered human papillomavirus 16 E7 plasmid DNA. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr; 188(4):916-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  24. Multiple human papillomavirus genotype infections in cervical cancer progression in the study to understand cervical cancer early endpoints and determinants. Int J Cancer. 2009 Nov 01; 125(9):2151-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  25. Age-appropriate use of human papillomavirus vaccines in the U.S. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug; 114(2):365-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.