Michael Gold to Colposcopy
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gold has written about Colposcopy.
Connection Strength
2.234
-
Observed Colposcopy Practice in US Community-Based Clinics: The Retrospective Control Arm of the IMPROVE-COLPO Study. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2019 Apr; 23(2):110-115.
Score: 0.633
-
Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or Worse by Cytology, Human Papillomavirus 16/18, and Colposcopy Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 09; 132(3):725-735.
Score: 0.152
-
A prospective study of risk-based colposcopy demonstrates improved detection of cervical precancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 06; 218(6):604.e1-604.e8.
Score: 0.146
-
Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 12; 130(6):1218-1225.
Score: 0.144
-
Evidence-Based Consensus Recommendations for Colposcopy Practice for Cervical Cancer Prevention in the United States. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct; 21(4):216-222.
Score: 0.143
-
ASCCP Colposcopy Standards: Risk-Based Colposcopy Practice. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct; 21(4):230-234.
Score: 0.143
-
Comparison of Colposcopic Impression Based on Live Colposcopy and Evaluation of Static Digital Images. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Apr; 20(2):154-61.
Score: 0.129
-
Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 01; 33(1):83-9.
Score: 0.117
-
High-risk human papillomavirus detection in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or higher-grade cytology using the Cervista HPV HR test. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Jan; 17(1):51-7.
Score: 0.103
-
Grading the severity of cervical neoplasia based on combined histopathology, cytopathology, and HPV genotype distribution among 1,700 women referred to colposcopy in Oklahoma. Int J Cancer. 2009 Feb 15; 124(4):964-9.
Score: 0.078
-
Adolescent cervical dysplasia: histologic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug; 197(2):141.e1-6.
Score: 0.071
-
A LEEP cervical conization is rarely indicated for a two-step discrepancy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Jul; 11(3):134-7.
Score: 0.070
-
Towards improved biomarker studies of cervical neoplasia: effects of precolposcopic procedures on gene expression patterns. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2005 Jun; 14(2):59-64.
Score: 0.061
-
Challenges Associated With Cervical Cancer Screening and Management in Obese Women: A Provider Perspective. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr; 24(2):184-191.
Score: 0.042
-
Evaluation of clinical performance of a novel urine-based HPV detection assay among women attending a colposcopy clinic. J Clin Virol. 2014 Aug; 60(4):414-7.
Score: 0.028
-
Tubal ligation frequency in Oklahoma women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov; 127(2):278-82.
Score: 0.025
-
Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 01; 18(15):4154-62.
Score: 0.025
-
Heterogeneity of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia related to HPV16: implications for natural history and management. Int J Cancer. 2013 Jan 01; 132(1):148-54.
Score: 0.024
-
Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e29051.
Score: 0.024
-
Cervical dysplasia in pregnancy: a multi-institutional evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug; 203(2):113.e1-6.
Score: 0.021
-
Accuracy of cervical specimens obtained for biomarker studies in women with CIN3. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec; 115(3):493-6.
Score: 0.020
-
Human papillomavirus cofactors by disease progression and human papillomavirus types in the study to understand cervical cancer early endpoints and determinants. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jan; 18(1):113-20.
Score: 0.019
-
Optical detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in vivo: results of a 604-patient study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May; 190(5):1249-57.
Score: 0.014