Header Logo

Connection

Zachary Smith to Spinal Fusion

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Zachary Smith has written about Spinal Fusion.
Connection Strength

7.770
  1. Letter to the Editor Regarding "The Potential Negative Effects of Smoking on Cervical and Lumbar Surgery Beyond Pseudarthrosis: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Study". World Neurosurg. 2023 Nov; 179:248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.744
  2. Lumbar Spinous Process Fixation and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of an Emerging Spinal Technology. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov; 30(9):E1279-E1288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.491
  3. Response to the Letter: Predictors for Airway Complications Following Single or Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 09 15; 42(18):E1095-E1096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.487
  4. Predictors for Airway Complications Following Single- and Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Mar 15; 42(6):379-384.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.470
  5. Evaluation of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification as 30-day morbidity predictor after single-level elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J. 2017 03; 17(3):313-320.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.455
  6. Thirty-day readmission rate and risk factors for patients undergoing single level elective anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Oct; 32:104-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.448
  7. Seroma observed 6 months after anterior lumbar interbody fusion that included use of recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2. Spine J. 2015 Oct 01; 15(10):e33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.415
  8. Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct; 27(7):358-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.397
  9. Comment on the biomechanical analysis of four- versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures. Spine J. 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1810-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.392
  10. Measuring surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: assessment of minimum clinically important difference. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e67408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  11. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: pathogenesis, management, and current surgical approaches. A review. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar; 30(3):E10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.309
  12. Anatomical considerations for subaxial (C2) pedicle screw placement: a radiographic study with computed tomography in 93 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 May; 23(3):176-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.292
  13. Trends in national utilization of posterior lumbar fusion and 30-day reoperation and readmission rates from 2006-2016. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 12; 199:106310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  14. Using artificial intelligence (AI) to predict postoperative surgical site infection: A retrospective cohort of 4046 posterior spinal fusions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 05; 192:105718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  15. Trends in National Use of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion from 2006 to 2016. World Neurosurg. 2020 06; 138:e42-e51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  16. Predictors of 30-Day Hospital Readmission After Posterior Cervical Fusion in 3401 Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 03 01; 43(5):356-363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  17. Comparing Short-term Complications of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of 6940 Patients Using the ACS-NSQIP Database. Clin Spine Surg. 2018 02; 31(1):43-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  18. The Effect of Steroids on Complications, Readmission, and Reoperation After Posterior Lumbar Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb; 110:e526-e533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  19. An Outcome and Cost Analysis Comparing Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy versus Computed Tomography-Guided Navigation. World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct; 94:255-260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  20. Is Cervical Sagittal Imbalance a Risk Factor for Adjacent Segment Pathomechanics After Multilevel Fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May; 41(10):E580-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  21. Impact of Resident Participation on Outcomes After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of 3265 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar; 41(5):E289-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  22. Incidence of graft extrusion following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb; 24:88-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  23. The concave versus convex approach for minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion for thoracolumbar degenerative scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Oct; 22(10):1588-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  24. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction. World Neurosurg. 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  25. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May; 22(5):487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  26. Evidence-based management of deep wound infection after spinal instrumentation. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Feb; 22(2):238-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  27. Cervical facet fractures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug; 21(2):310-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  28. Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion: outcomes and deformity correction. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):353-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  29. Intraoperative navigation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral interbody fusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):377-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  30. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):279-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  31. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1. World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  32. Outcome following unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center randomized prospective study. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug; 35(2):E13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  33. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Sci. 2011 Sep; 55(3):259-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  34. Minimally invasive extracavitary approach for thoracic discectomy and interbody fusion: 1-year clinical and radiographic outcomes in 13 patients compared with a cohort of traditional anterior transthoracic approaches. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Feb; 14(2):250-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  35. Symptomatic ectopic bone formation after off-label use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jan; 12(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  36. Management of Isolated Atlas Fractures: A Retrospective Study of 65 Patients. World Neurosurg. 2018 Mar; 111:e316-e322.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  37. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):337-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.