Header Logo

Connection

Zachary Smith to Lumbar Vertebrae

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Zachary Smith has written about Lumbar Vertebrae.
Zachary Smith
Connection Strength
6.259
Lumbar Vertebrae
  1. Lumbar Spinous Process Fixation and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of an Emerging Spinal Technology. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov; 30(9):E1279-E1288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.540
  2. Thirty-day readmission rate and risk factors for patients undergoing single level elective anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Oct; 32:104-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.493
  3. Exertional ventral epidural hematoma in the lumbar spine. Spine J. 2015 Feb 01; 15(2):373-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.437
  4. Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct; 27(7):358-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.436
  5. Minimally invasive spinal surgery for the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jan; 22(1):42-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.433
  6. Comment on the biomechanical analysis of four- versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures. Spine J. 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1810-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.431
  7. Biomechanics of thoracolumbar burst fractures: methods of induction and treatments. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Dec; 21(12):2059-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.428
  8. Validating the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep; 21(3):495-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.426
  9. Biomechanical effects of a unilateral approach to minimally invasive lumbar decompression. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e92611.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.420
  10. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis results in increased reoperation rates and costs without improving patient outcomes. Evid Based Med. 2014 Aug; 19(4):136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.417
  11. Letter to the Editor Regarding "The Potential Negative Effects of Smoking on Cervical and Lumbar Surgery Beyond Pseudarthrosis: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Study". World Neurosurg. 2023 Nov; 179:248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  12. Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr; 45(2):965-978.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  13. Trends in national utilization of posterior lumbar fusion and 30-day reoperation and readmission rates from 2006-2016. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 12; 199:106310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  14. The Effect of Steroids on Complications, Readmission, and Reoperation After Posterior Lumbar Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb; 110:e526-e533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  15. The concave versus convex approach for minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion for thoracolumbar degenerative scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Oct; 22(10):1588-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  16. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction. World Neurosurg. 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  17. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May; 22(5):487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  18. Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion: outcomes and deformity correction. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):353-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  19. Intraoperative navigation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral interbody fusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):377-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  20. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):279-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  21. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1. World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  22. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Sci. 2011 Sep; 55(3):259-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  23. Symptomatic ectopic bone formation after off-label use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jan; 12(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  24. Importance of valid, reliable, and responsive outcome measures for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2023 03; 23(3):345-349.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  25. Impact of CrossFit-Related Spinal Injuries. Clin J Sport Med. 2019 11; 29(6):482-485.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  26. Incidence of graft extrusion following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb; 24:88-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  27. Management of flexion distraction injuries to the thoracolumbar spine. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Dec; 22(12):1853-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  28. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy. World Neurosurg. 2014 Mar-Apr; 81(3-4):634-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  29. Outcome following unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center randomized prospective study. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug; 35(2):E13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.