Header Logo

Connection

Andrew John to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrew John has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.331
  1. The Impact of Amplification on Cognitive Screening Test Scores. J Gerontol Nurs. 2022 Jul; 48(7):31-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  2. Hearing Loss and Cognitive Screening. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Jul-Aug; 14(4):170-172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  3. Effect of Reduced Audibility on Mini-Mental State Examination Scores. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Nov/Dec; 30(10):845-855.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  4. Equivalence and test-retest reproducibility of conventional and extended-high-frequency audiometric thresholds obtained using pure-tone and narrow-band-noise stimuli. Int J Audiol. 2017 09; 56(9):635-642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  5. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 25(10):1022-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  6. Effects of advancing age and hearing loss on gaps-in-noise test performance. Am J Audiol. 2012 Dec; 21(2):242-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  7. Validity of hearing impairment calculation methods for prediction of self-reported hearing handicap. Noise Health. 2012 Jan-Feb; 14(56):13-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  8. A case law review of the individuals with disabilities education act for children with hearing loss or auditory processing disorders. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jul-Aug; 21(7):426-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  9. Implications and attitudes of audiologists towards smartphone integration in hearing healthcare. Hear Res. 2018 11; 369:15-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  10. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children. Int J Audiol. 2017 12; 56(12):976-988.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  11. Prevalence of tinnitus and noise-induced hearing loss in dentists. Noise Health. 2016 Nov-Dec; 18(85):347-354.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  12. Evaluation of Performance With an Adaptive Digital Remote Microphone System and a Digital Remote Microphone Audio-Streaming Accessory System. Am J Audiol. 2015 Sep; 24(3):440-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  13. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and non-linear frequency compression for children with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2015 Mar; 54(3):170-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  14. Evaluation of the benefits of binaural hearing on the telephone for children with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jan; 26(1):93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  15. Evaluation of speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients using a personal digital adaptive radio frequency system. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Sep; 24(8):714-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  16. Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb; 34(1):52-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Psychosocial status of children with auditory processing disorder. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Mar; 23(3):222-33; quiz 234.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  19. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2011 Jun; 50(6):396-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  20. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Nov-Dec; 21(10):618-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  21. Multiple benefits of personal FM system use by children with auditory processing disorder (APD). Int J Audiol. 2009; 48(6):371-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.