Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Andrea Vincent and Kirby Gilliland.
Connection Strength

1.500
  1. Test-retest reliability and practice effects for the ANAM General Neuropsychological Screening battery. Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 04; 32(3):479-494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.597
  2. Effects of military deployment on cognitive functioning. Mil Med. 2012 Mar; 177(3):248-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  3. Evidence for added value of baseline testing in computer-based cognitive assessment. J Athl Train. 2013 Jul-Aug; 48(4):499-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  4. Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (v4) Traumatic Brain Injury Battery: military normative data. Mil Med. 2012 Mar; 177(3):256-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  5. Cognitive change associated with self-reported mild traumatic brain injury sustained during the OEF/OIF conflicts. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012; 26(3):473-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  6. Reference data from the automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics for use in traumatic brain injury in an active duty military sample. Mil Med. 2008 Sep; 173(9):836-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  7. Initial clinical validation of an embedded performance validity measure within the automated neuropsychological metrics (ANAM). Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 Nov; 28(7):700-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  8. Learning to live on a Mars day: fatigue countermeasures during the Phoenix Mars Lander mission. Sleep. 2012 Oct 01; 35(10):1423-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  9. Traditional neuropsychological correlates and reliability of the automated neuropsychological assessment metrics-4 battery for Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Aug; 18(7):864-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  10. Reliability and construct validity of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) mood scale. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan; 23(1):73-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.