Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Rebecca Larson and Debra Bemben.
Connection Strength
1.116
-
Ankle dorsiflexion asymmetry and the relationship with walking performance in people with multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture. 2023 Oct 02.
Score: 0.216
-
Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability. Front Physiol. 2020; 11:517.
Score: 0.173
-
Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2020 03 03; 20(1):62-76.
Score: 0.169
-
Evaluation of Power Production Asymmetry during Cycling in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 09 17; 16(18).
Score: 0.164
-
Can Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Improve Ham:Quad Ratios Better Than Traditional Training? Int J Exerc Sci. 2019; 12(4):1080-1093.
Score: 0.162
-
The perceptual responses of individuals with multiple sclerosis to blood flow restriction versus traditional resistance exercise. Physiol Behav. 2021 02 01; 229:113219.
Score: 0.044
-
Low-load resistance training with low relative pressure produces muscular changes similar to high-load resistance training. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Dec; 56(6):E126-E133.
Score: 0.034
-
The influence of exercise load with and without different levels of blood flow restriction on acute changes in muscle thickness and lactate. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 Nov; 37(6):734-740.
Score: 0.032
-
Appendicular lean mass and site-specific muscle loss in the extremities correlate with dynamic strength. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 May; 37(3):328-331.
Score: 0.031
-
Effects of age on arterial stiffness and central blood pressure after an acute bout of resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jan; 116(1):39-48.
Score: 0.031
-
Effects of exercise with and without different degrees of blood flow restriction on torque and muscle activation. Muscle Nerve. 2015 May; 51(5):713-21.
Score: 0.030
-
The effects of resistance exercise with and without different degrees of blood-flow restriction on perceptual responses. J Sports Sci. 2015; 33(14):1472-9.
Score: 0.030